We built Radius because we've seen the problem.
An engineering company, not a consulting firm.
We've spent years across the healthcare data stack, including engagements with large health plans wrestling with network adequacy on legacy software like Quest. We came at it as technologists, watching the work get solved with overnight batch jobs and data that arrived too late to matter. Radius is what happens when engineers, not consultants, decide to fix it.
Adequacy is a software problem, treated as a reporting problem.
On engagements with health plans tackling network adequacy on tools like Quest, the patterns were obvious from the technology side: data going stale faster than the platforms could refresh it, geospatial computations that should have been seconds taking hours, and pricing models that put continuous use out of reach. The legacy stack was built for an era when the question got asked once a year. The enforcement era we're entering needs the answer on demand, and the existing tooling was never going to get there.
Engineers, not analysts.
Our background is in distributed systems, geospatial infrastructure, and large-scale data pipelines, with experience across the broader healthcare data and operations stack. We treated network adequacy as the engineering problem it always was: a routing computation, a freshness pipeline, an API contract, a latency budget.
Most adequacy companies are consulting firms that wrote some software around their deliverables. Radius is a technology company building the platform those consulting firms wish they had. The difference shows up in the response times, the integration surface, the price point, and the ambition.